There was a very timely article in the Edmonton Journal yesterday. The author asked if we're not perhaps putting the cart before the horse with all this talk about financing, before even asking if the new arena project is in the right area?
The story is here.
The author thinks the proposal is too far away from downtown to have a real impact on development, and touches on the traffic issues brought up on this blog elsewhere. It's a valid criticism. I liked his thoughts on what the indoor attractions and pedways would do to street level foot traffic as well.
I think there's a bit of two competing ideals at work here though. The writer is looking at the development from a strictly "city" approach, about what would be best for the downtown core and for the city. I think Mr. Katz is trying to work with that, while at the same time looking at the bottom-line and an eye toward future profit. In this case, he purchased the land which is available. Business reasons may not make it the best site, but it was the land which was for sale. Other sites may be better, but if their costs are significantly higher it may not be the best approach (especially if taxpayers have to fund some of this!).
I agree with Matt that the author who wrote this article does provide some valid criticism and points to ponder in terms of location of this proposed arena district. He also seems to have a bias towards building around Jasper Avenue, as that has been the "traditional" main street of the downtown core for a long period of time. But perhaps we need to break this traditional mould that some Edmontonians seem to be thinking in and start some new traditions on 104th avenue.
ReplyDeleteThat's a good point. Cities grow and evolve, and there's no saying that we can't build a vibrant downtown area a couple of blocks north of the traditional downtown. Ideally we could have the whole area from Jasper Ave to the land north of 104th blossom with new projects.
ReplyDeleteI know GM Place in Vancouver is a bit off the main downtown. It hasn't affected it though, and since it's within walking distance hasn't had much negative effect of development.